beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 29, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months at the Busan District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 7, 2014.
The defendant, using the personal information of C, which he came to know with B as a result of the non-fluence with B, opened two cellular phones in the name of C and conspired to use it for the cost of living.
1. On June 7, 2013, the Defendant, along with B, signed the name, resident registration number, false address, etc. of C with a new service contract requesting the opening of a cell phone located therein, at the “F office” of the E operation of the Daejeon Sung-gu Daejeon building A, 114-1, and B as C. The Defendant signed the name, resident registration number, and false address of C by using a black pen in two copies of the new service contract requesting the opening of a cell phone located therein.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, forged the above mobile phone service new contract in the name of C, which is a private document related to rights and duties, for the purpose of exercising.
2. In collusion with B, the Defendant: (a) delivered two copies of a new service contract in the name of forged C to E at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place; (b) as if they were genuine.
3. The Defendant, along with B, committed the above date, time, place, B as if they were C, and the Defendant presented two copies of a new service contract in the above forged C name to the victim E, and the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, in the name of the wife C, would faithfully pay the two mobile phone bills and monetary bills in the name of the wife C.
However, the defendant and B had no intention or ability to pay installment payments and telephone bills even if they are opened in the name of C because they had the intention to open the cell phone in the name of C and sell it in other places and use it for the cost of living.
Nevertheless, the Defendant conspired with B to do so.