A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on the following: (a) two years of suspended sentence; (b) a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court on February 18, 2013; and (c) a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Sungnam Branch Branch of Suwon District Court on November 23, 2009.

On November 7, 2018, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on November 22, 2018, driven a C-free car in a section where it is difficult to know from the roads adjacent to Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu to the roads adjacent to the same Gu B, while under the influence of alcohol 0.19% of alcohol level without obtaining a driver’s license.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license under the influence of alcohol again.

2. On November 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of drinking driving while driving a car from the above C Stopon on the road near Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul at around November 22:4, 2018; and (b) was demanded to present a driver’s license from the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station D.

The defendant presented F's first class large and second class ordinary driver's license under the name of the commissioner of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency, which is an official document in possession, as if the defendant was the defendant's driver's license.

3. On November 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) when he controlled on a road near Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul; (b) when putting in line F on a road near Mapo-gu; (c) stated “F” in the driver’s name column of the report on the state of the driver’s state of the driver’s state of the driver’s state, affixed his signature on the back, and submitted it as if he had been duly formed to E who was affiliated with the Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station D, who knew of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant was named F, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.