logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.05.22 2014고단326
범인도피교사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 4, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and a violation of the Road Traffic Act on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act on September 4, 2007, and was sentenced to a summary order of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on June 9, 201, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on June 20, 2012. The Defendant again was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on June 20, 2012. On March 22:30, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.10% of blood alcohol concentration, and was driving at the section of 15m from the Seoul Seocheon-dong department near the Seocho-gu Seoul Western department to approximately 11-k of 34km Dong-dong, Mapo-dong.

2. When a police officer who was reported by causing a traffic accident while driving a motor vehicle at the scene at the front of 344-1 of Mapo-gu Seoul Western-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul and caused a criminal escape to be dispatched to the scene and take on-site measures, the Defendant: (a) asked D to request D to “It is deemed that he would drive a motor vehicle during the current period of probation; and (b) let such D make the said D make a false confession as if he driven the motor vehicle on behalf of the Defendant.”

The above D, upon the request of the defendant, stated that he was driving the above SM5 vehicle to E, who was called to the above SM5 vehicle at the Seoul Mapo Police Station, and continued to be investigated by the Seoul Mapo Police Station, F, who was in charge of the investigation, prepared a statement of traffic accident situation as if he driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and responded to the alcohol test.

Accordingly, the Defendant instigated the above D to make a false statement as above and to comply with the drinking alcohol measurement, thereby instigating the criminal escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. The register of driver's licenses;

arrow