Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Interference with business affairs, the Defendant: (a) was a victim C (nb, 47 years old) who was in Sinung-si B on March 9, 2020; (b) was seated on another table without any reason while drinking alcohol in D’ cafeteria; (c) on March 9, 2020; and (d) the Defendant was a customer E who was seated on the other table without any reason.
10 10 10 10
Chewing sark walk, such as a Chewing dog, are not saring and cutting off.
Chewing shall be teared.
“The victim’s head, knifeing the victim’s head, knife the victim’s head, knife the victim’s head, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by force, and at the same time, the victim inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about 21 days.
2. On March 9, 2020, around 21:05, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties; (b) sustained a disturbance prior to the restaurant as indicated in paragraph (1); and (c) went to the scene after receiving a report as stated in paragraph (1) by 112; (d) went to the police box belonging to the police box of the Sinung Police Station at the site; and (e) responded to the patrol draft on the ground that he was sent to the police box G and the police officer assigned to the police officer at his own seat; (b) took the patrol box at the front of the patrol box at around 14 days; and (c) had the victim H (Y, 23 years old); and (d) had the victim’s her face at the time of having been sent to the police box at around 21:08 on the same day after receiving a request for assistance by the police officer assigned to the police officer assigned to the police station at his own seat; and (e) had the victim’s her own patrol box during the first round of the police box.
As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report processing, and at the same time injured the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to I, H, and C;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs, respective photographs, and written diagnosis of injury;
1. Article 257 of the Criminal Code as to the facts constituting the crime.