A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:10, at E restaurant operated by the victim D in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) continuously, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant continued to cause her customers, who were in his/her employees F and next to the restaurant, to take a bath for about 15 minutes of the disturbance, including, but not limited to, a large amount of her employees F and other customers who were in his/her place under the influence of alcohol; and (c) taking the soften minutes of the disturbance on the restaurant wall, and let them out of the main place.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim's restaurant by force.

2. The Defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim H (27) to disclose personal information at the police box belonging to the police box of the branch police station G police station, which was called upon receiving the report of 112, at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 1, and without complying therewith, the Defendant expressed that “the victim’s chest is flusium, flusium, flusium, and flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, and flusium at the same bit of bitch flusium,” and that “the victim flusium flusium, flusium, flusium, and flusium, flusium, and flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers with respect to the processing of reports and the case investigation, and at the same time injured the victim.

3. If comparing the legal interests of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties and the protection of the legal interests of insult, this part of the crime cannot be seen as being absorption into the crime of interference with the performance of official duties.

The Defendant, at the same date and time as indicated in paragraph 1, and at the same place, has been requested by the victim H, a police box belonging to the branch police station, to disclose personal information from the victim H, who is an employee of the other police station, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 5, 2, 5