1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the remaining crimes except for the multi-crimes of No. 1 and No. 5 of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who was elected as a candidate for the 19th National Assembly member election in the 19th National Assembly member election in April 11, 2012, and the defendant A was a person in charge of the accounting of the defendant B candidate election office.

"2012 Gohap789"

1. Defendant A’s violation of the Public Official Election Act

(a) No person shall make, or have another person make, a contribution act in favor of a candidate or a person who desires to become a candidate in connection with an election;

On February 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested the J to provide “B candidates” and requested the B candidates to provide the said restaurant, and (b) made B candidates enter the said restaurant and read “B. Domain City”; and (c) the “O” in the written indictment appears to be a clerical error in the J.

70,000 won of food was provided to the police.

Accordingly, the defendant made contributions to the election for the candidate.

(b) No one may offer, promise, direct, induce, mediate, request or receive money, goods, or other benefits in connection with the election campaign regardless of the pretext thereof, such as allowances, actual expenses, other compensation for volunteer services, etc., except where he/she provides allowances, actual expenses, and other benefits under the Public Official Election Act to provide the prices for election campaign name;

1 Defendant from February 15, 2012 to the point of view

3. Until May 3, 200, the “P” of L’s indictment, which executed the candidates B around 29 February 2012, appears to be a clerical error in the “L” to K of an election campaign worker who recruited electors.

On February 29, 2012, the election campaign workers issued KRW 100,00 to the election campaign workers M, respectively, and expressed their intent to provide KRW 200,000 to the first police officer on February 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant provided money and valuables in relation to the election campaign and expressed his intention to provide money and valuables.

2. On March 28, 2012, the Defendant asked 16 telephone campaign workers to “one day to know” of the 16 members of the telephone campaign office.