1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 15, 2011, the Plaintiff visited the Department C operated by the Defendant and received medical treatment from the Defendant due to the receipt of the charge.

B. As a result of the examination and treatment, the Defendant diagnosed that it is necessary to crypate as a result of the examination and treatment that the shock symptoms No. 6, 7, and 27 (hereinafter “cypium”) on the left side of the Plaintiff, and conducted the cryping procedure No. 26 and 27 on the day of the Plaintiff’s birth.

C. After that, on December 15, 201, the Plaintiff, who was the reservation date, was admitted to the Defendant’s dental clinic on March 19, 201, and was admitted to the Defendant’s dental clinic on March 19, 2013, and the Defendant completed the Plaintiff’s procedure of planting a crypter on the crypter’s body No. 26 and No. 27 and installing a crypter.

The defendant, at 26th and 27th of the plaintiff's 26 and 27, "a procedure for planting a plastic body on the part of the gold farm," "a procedure for planting a plastic body."

D. The Plaintiff is from March 20, 2013 to March 20, 2013, after the instant plastic surgery.

3. From June 17, 2013, the Defendant complained that there was inconvenience and pain in the crypary treatment No. 26 and No. 27 as to the crypary treatment after checking the progress of the cryp treatment by around 26, and receiving disinfection measures, etc., and that there was no inconvenience and pain in the cryp treatment again around June 17, 2013. The Defendant implemented only preservation measures such as cryping, etc. on the ground that it was impossible to detect salt or abnormal symptoms in the cryp operation department or the surrounding area, and subsequently removed the Plaintiff’s crypary treatment around October 25, 2013.

E. On December 11, 2013, the Defendant agreed to the Plaintiff that, by preparing and delivering a letter of payment stating that “the Defendant would bear the expenses if the Plaintiff claims the expenses for the completion of two or more cryms and the cryms treatment at the hospital desired by the Plaintiff, the Defendant would bear the expenses to be incurred for the treatment of the cryms and the crym treatment of the cryms in the future 26 and 27.

(f) The Plaintiff entered into the instant payment agreement to the Defendant on or before June 2, 2014.