1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that operates C University, and the Intervenor was appointed to C University on March 2004 and served as a non-management department assistant professor.

B. On March 10, 2014, C University Industry-Academic Cooperation Team recruited pure research tasks in 2014 as follows.

Business name: pure research project name: Before entering into a contract, support for research expenses of KRW 2 million: The submission of a report to the responsible research institute on the results of a lump sum payment (necessary to provide documentary evidence of disbursement due to the execution of research expenses) after withholding a total amount of KRW 2 million from the research cost: One copy of the chain of publication or a certificate of scheduled publication of a thesis publication in the academic journal within six months (by November 31, 2014) from the date the research is completed (by November 31, 2014) (by May 31, 2015):

C. On April 24, 2014, the Intervenor submitted the following research ethics pledge (hereinafter “instant pledge”) upon filing an application for pure research tasks with the Intervenor’s responsible researcher and E professor as the subject of “D,” and received KRW 2 million research expenses on April 25, 2014.

The participants in a written pledge of research ethics will conduct a honest and strict research in compliance with the guidelines to ensure research ethics (No. 260 of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Directive) in conducting research on pure tasks supported by C Universities and Colleges, and if they violate the above guidelines, they will follow the measures of universities and raise objections.

On February 27, 2015, the intervenor submitted to CK a certificate of planned publication of the thesis in the name of the Korea Distribution Science Association.

E. On February 2, 2016, the Plaintiff, following a resolution by the teachers’ disciplinary committee, dismissed the Intervenor on the ground that the Intervenor violated Article 61(1) of the Private School Act and Article 53(1) of the Articles of incorporation of the corporation (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”).

1. The subjects of “D” on April 24, 2014 are “D” as a pure research participant.