logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017.01.26 2016누12552
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit is resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Grounds for disciplinary action;

1. The Intervenor received benefits equivalent to KRW 2 million per month as the position of the adviser, advertising and marketing adviser and special instructor operated by his spouse D, B, E, children F, and two instructors, and participated in the activities such as lectures, counseling, advice, company and publicity of private teaching institutes.

2. The Intervenor worked as an instructor at the course opened by G after receiving KRW 200,000 per capita tuition fees from November 8, 2013 to November 30, 2013 as the subject of “self cancer” for the general public.

3. The intervenor, as the subject of “the process to enhance the concentration, self-esteem, and memory” for elementary school students and high school students G, performed as an instructor in the curriculum of giving and receiving KRW 100,000 won for various inspection costs and teaching materials, from May 24, 2014 to May 5 (Demand Day, Saturdays).

4. The intervenor, in cooperation with H, worked as an instructor in an open lecture where only KRW 10,00 won is received from the on-site receiver at the cost of participating in the education from April 3, 2014 to April 13:00 to 15:30 as the subject of “I” as an employee change training program.

5. The Intervenor, along with J as a mobile app development company, developed and sold the application, such as “K”, “L”, “M”, “N”, and “O”.

6. The Intervenor, along with his/her child F, developed a cartoon best program on the cartoon screen and sold an item with respect to cartoons, classical books, anti-smoking, and non-satis to live, separate from his/her child F.

7. The Intervenor published the model “R” by forming a P and project group.

8. The Intervenor, while serving as a director of the educational foundation S, violated the provisions relating to permission for concurrent office by attending the board of directors on April 16, 2014, July 18, July 31, and September 24, 201.

9. An intervenor shall call to the person in charge of university policies by the Ministry of Education on December 15, 2014, although the intervenor did not have obtained permission to hold concurrent offices from the side of the Cuniversity.

arrow