logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1989. 12. 26. 선고 89누6723 판결
[제2차납세의무자지정처분등취소][공1990.2.15(866),420]
Main Issues

Scope of taxes for which a business transferee is liable for secondary tax payment;

Summary of Judgment

(a) If the secondary tax liability is imposed on the assignee of the business in accordance with Article 41 of the Framework Act on National Taxes, it is required to be the tax already imposed at the time of the transfer of the business;

[Reference Provisions]

Article 41 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 87Nu1174 Decided April 12, 1988

Plaintiff-Appellee

News Co., Ltd.

Defendant-Appellant

The director of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 89Gu4460 delivered on August 22, 1989

Notes

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Due to this reason

We examine the grounds of appeal.

If the second tax liability is imposed on the transferee of the business pursuant to Article 41 of the Framework Act on National Taxes, it is required that the tax already imposed at the time of the transfer of the business (see Supreme Court Decision 87Nu1174 delivered on April 12, 198). Accordingly, the court below's decision that the defendant's disposition that the plaintiff designated the plaintiff as the second tax obligor is unlawful because it was based on the national tax, etc. imposed on the above non-party 1 after receiving the business from the non-party 1 is justified.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Ansan-man (Presiding Justice)

arrow