logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2012.06.28 2012고정686
사기등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won;

2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Ulsan District Court for fraud, etc. and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 21, 2009.

1. Around June 25, 2008, the Defendant forged a private document by using a black tool on the paper of application form for customer subscription which was kept at the agency Changwon-si B, the Defendant entered “C”, “D”, “D”, “A”, “A”, “A” in the relevant column, “C” in the proxy name column at the time of proxy visit, “C” in the application form, “C”, “C” on June 25, 2008, “C” in the applicant column, and signed the applicant’s name next to the name, and signed the applicant “C”, “A” in the name column of legal representative, “A” in the relevant column, “the date of application”, “C” and “C” in the column of application form, and signed the buyer’s name next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for customer subscription in the name of user C, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and one copy of the application form for customer subscription.

2. The Defendant, at the above time and at the same place, delivered to F of the above agency employee F a forged customer subscription application and application form for customer subscription as if the document was duly formed, and exercised the above investigation document.

3. The Defendant, at the above date and time, proposed a forged customer subscription application, application form for customer subscription, and family relation certificate, and deceiving the above F as if he/she had a legitimate authority to enter mobile phones in the name of C, as he/she had obtained C’s consent.

The Defendant was issued one mobile phone at the market price in the victim G in the same place as the above F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. The statement of the police officer concerning G;

arrow