logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.24 2015고정770
사문서위조등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On October 17, 201, the Defendant: (a) indicated “D” in the subscriber’s name column; (b) “D” in the subscriber’s address column; (c) in the customer’s name column; (d) in the customer’s name column; and (d) in the customer’s name column; (d) in the customer’s name column; and (d) in the customer’s personal information request column; and (d) in the customer’s personal information request column; and (d) the customer’s request for consent to the use and inquiry of personal credit information; and (d) written “D”, personal information, location information, and credit information collection, provision, and handling of the information on the customer’s request column; and (d) signed thereon.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant, using the official approval color writing on the application form for the new service of the KT Telecommunication Agency located at the same time and at the same place, entered “D” in the subscriber’s customer name column, “B” in the subscriber’s address column, “F” in the relevant column, “F” in the bank name column, “G” in the bank name column, “G” in the account number column, “G” in the application form for new service, “D” in the applicant column, and “D” in the applicant column, “personal credit information collection, use, consignment provision” in the application form, and signed on the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, exercised each of the above 'the new service contract' in a lump sum as the above 'the above 'the new service contract' was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused and F;

1. The police of D. D.

arrow