logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단3307
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes related to self-loan on August 5, 2016;

A. On August 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Symology laboratory of C University in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) on the guarantee column for the terms and conditions of the real estate lease agreement for D, Daegu-gu, building E, the Defendant’s wife, “F million won”; (c) on June 1, 2016; (d) on the term column, “from June 1, 2017; (e) on the lease to the original condition; (e) on the damage of the facility; (g) on the basis of the terms and conditions, “I, J, D”; and (e) on the lessor column, the Defendant prepared and sealed PPT H H, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, and the lessee’s name and affix his seal to PPD; and (e) “after the lessee’s name and affix his seal to Q Q Q, Q Q, the Defendant’s name and affix his seal to PPD.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one chapter of the real estate lease agreement in the name of D, M and Q, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On August 5, 2016, the Defendant presented one copy of the above forged real estate lease agreement to V operators of credit business chain Co., Ltd., V, who was unaware of such circumstances at the U store located in Daegu Suwon-gu T on August 5, 2016 as if they were duly formed.

Accordingly, the Defendant exercised one chapter of the lease contract in the name of M and Q, a private document on forged rights and obligations.

(c)

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant presented a real estate lease agreement in the name of the above D, M, and Q to provide the victim W with a security to obtain a loan from the victim in the U shop coffee shop located in Daegu Suwon-gu T.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and the debt is equivalent to KRW 70 million, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party with forged real estate lease contract, he did not have any ability or intent to make timely repayment.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceivings the victim.

arrow