The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the imprisonment for seven months and the fine of five million won, the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for two years) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and there is a need for a simple and strict punishment against the business owner operating illegal sexual traffic establishments even in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, but on the other hand, there is no record of punishment for the same crime, and there is no record of punishment for the same crime, the court below's punishment against the defendant is too unjustifiable because of the following factors: the method and period of the crime of this case, the amount of profits acquired by the crime, the size of profits acquired by the crime, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., which are revealed in the records and arguments, are comprehensively taken into account: the court below's punishment against the defendant is too unjustifiable.

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.