Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and nine months, and imprisonment with prison labor of one year and three months, and imprisonment with prison labor of one year and one year.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A and Defendant B are those who actually operated the Dispute Resolution Council, the Dispute Resolution Council, the K, and the Dispute Resolution Council, and Defendant C have been registered as the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Council and had been registered as the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Council while working as an employee from the Dispute Resolution Council.

Defendants are products that, around July 2016, the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M and N head office, and that, in the trade name of "P", the business employees'O calls to victims Qu who operate a small-scale director center, and that, “R by proxy.”

If 1,056,00 won is settled at a fixed amount, the Internet advertisement will be made at the upper end of the RS for a period of two years.

“To give an explanation.”

However, the Defendants used the fact that small-scale merchants have continuously failed to confirm whether they become advertisements to RS during the agreed period of time, and used to charge T only small amounts of money, and planned to operate a business by charging small amounts of money only to the victims making a claim due to the failure to search to S., and during the agreed period of time, they did not have any intent or ability to advertise the damaged business entity as agreed in RS.

From November 1, 2016 to December 18, 2016, the Defendants had 1,056,000 won from the victimized person by credit card as advertising expenses, and had 110 victims settle the total sum of KRW 190,036,920 from November 25, 2014 to December 18, 2016 as shown in the list of crimes No. 1 of the attached Table 1, and had 110 victims settle the same with the credit card under the pretext of advertising expenses.

As a result, the Defendants deceiving victims to acquire financial benefits from the victims.

Defendant A and B, at around 05:30 on April 13, 2017, respectively, enter approximately 0.1g of marijuana purchased from a local person of the Philippines on his/her name in a tobacco, with a fire attached thereto, enter it into a tobacco with a smoke, and enter the smoke mutually, and go through a horse.