logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.04.03 2014고단1338
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

E and A jointly run an entertainment drinking house with the trade name of “N” on the first floor, the first floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, and the second floor, and the second floor, and the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, and the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, and the second floor, the second floor, the second floor, and the second floor, the second floor, the second floor,

Defendant

D is a person who operates the “R” tele-gu Q Q in Manyang-gu, Mangyang-si, and Defendant F is a person who exercises overall control over the business of the above Moel with the former’s affairs.

Since approximately 200 meters away from the above main point of view, the above main point of view, including Defendant B, P, etc., concluded a contract between the Plaintiff and the main point of view that the main point of view, from around September 2013, in order for the customers who want sexual traffic to gather, wherein the main point of view, entered the name of the main place of view and the regular name of the main place of view, and then provide guidance to the master room, and the regular director, by allowing the above main point of view to the guest room in which the customer was well-known, and by allowing the customer to take the above main place of view and to settle the amount of KRW 60,000 in a lump sum, with the payment of KRW 60,00.

1. Defendants B and C conspired to arrange sexual traffic by having them receive a contact loan and sexual intercourse from an unspecified number of customers who found the above main points.

On January 15, 2014, the Defendants: (a) around 23:29, around 2014, and around 23:29, Defendant B: (b) instructed Defendant C to receive the drinking value and the total price of sexual traffic from Defendant C, who is a customer, and (c) directed Defendant C to provide the said telecom as 301 by burning T in UM7 car at the above main shop; (b) Defendant B instructed V, who is the above main shop, to provide sexual intercourse, and arranged sexual traffic; (c) around 23:51 on the same day; and (d) P, around 23:51 on the same day, P, from the day of the day of the customer’s daily activity, the alcohol value and the price of sexual traffic.

arrow