beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, for two years, for two years, for Defendant C, D, and E, for one year and six months, for each of them, and for Defendant F.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Status of the Defendants] Defendant A is the Chairman of the P Q labor union R division (hereinafter “R division”), Defendant B is the Head of the R division in Seoul and the Gyeonggi branch, Defendant C is the R division in Busan and the Head of the Gyeonggi-do branch, Defendant D, the Head of the R division in Seoul and the Gyeonggi-do branch, Defendant D and the Head of the organization of the Seoul and the Gyeonggi-do branch, Defendant F is the Head of the R division in North Korea before the R division, Defendant G is the Head of the Daejeon and the Gyeonggi-do branch, Defendant G is the Head of the Chungcheongnam-gu and the Gyeonggi-do branch, the Head of the Seoul and the Gyeonggi-do branch, the Head of the Gyeonggi-do branch, the Head of the Gyeonggi-do branch in Seoul and the Gyeonggi-do branch, the Head of the labor safety division in Korea and the Head of the Gyeonggi-do branch in Seoul and the Gyeonggi-do branch in Seoul, the Head of the Gyeonggi-do branch in Seoul and the Gyeonggi-do branch in Seoul, and Defendant D's branch in Seoul and North Korea.
[Criminal facts]
1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A, B, J, D, E, N, L, M, or K (Crimes with the aim of coercioning employment as a counter-party);
A. The Defendants, in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint coercion) against the victim S, and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint rapion) conspired to force the employment of R decentralization and affiliated typists, as if they did not employ the victim S, who is operating T (T) a stree rental company, as the Plaintiff did not employ a streging engineer belonging to the R (hereinafter “T”) as the streging engineer belonging to the T (hereinafter “T”), as if they were accused of the related parties at the construction site as a violation of the Industrial Safety and Health Act, and as if they were disadvantaged in the progress of construction, such as holding an assembly.
From March 2014 to April 17, 2014, Defendant D, E, N, L, M, and K stated, according to the above public offering, Defendant D, N, L, M, and T employees U.S. as follows: “Once the victim and T employees are scheduled to install four other workshops in T, three typ operators belonging to P will be employed. Unless otherwise, the strike against T will take place at the labor union level.”
The victim shall use another unit engineer employed by T, and the request for employment shall be made.