beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and by imprisonment of 6 months, respectively.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
The crime history room (Defendant A and B) Defendant A operates R and S as a professor of Q University in P, and Defendant B is the multicultural welfare department and division of Q University.
Defendant
A, on March 2015, in order to receive a request from C to request for employment of his own children in his school from the mutual influence point in Gwangju Mine-gu, the head of the administrative division is also aware of all the directors and founders of Qu University, and the head of the administrative division is also aware of it.
After concluding the phrase “I”, Defendant B, who is in charge of the planning director of the school foundation and is in charge of multicultural welfare department, requested the recruitment of T administrative staff.
Defendant
B At the request of the Defendant A for the recruitment of T's administrative positions, Defendant A asked the U.S. head of the school administration division, who is the fraud of the school founder and the president, to find employment of the children of the branch.
U is a person who has requested the employment of the administrative office by Defendant B and is subject to the application for the recruitment period.
After saying ", at that time, T in the W coffee shop located in Gwangju Mine-gu V, means the number of recruitments, interview days, etc., and "the procedure to be employed by fish free trade" will be conducted formally and will be performed by the administrative office.
“.....”
After that, T was employed as an employee of the administrative office through the public notice of employment of employees of the school administration office.
As above, the Defendants received KRW 10,000,000 in cash around March 2, 2015, upon receipt of a request from QU administrative staff from C, and received KRW 20,000,000 from Defendant A’s bank account, and received KRW 30,000,000 in total on two occasions on April 2, 2015.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to intervene in the employment of others for profit.
Summary of Evidence
1. The Defendants’ all or part of the legal statements
1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants and C by the prosecution
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. Police against U.S.