logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.03.31 2016고정69
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in his own business, and the victims are police officers.

1. On October 1, 2015, the Defendant, at around 20:40 on the street room in front of the cafeteria C cafeteria, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, and at around 112, prevented the victim D and the Defendant, who was on the part of the victim D and E, called out after receiving the 112 report, thereby insulting the victim D by “the victim D, who was sexually imprisecule, embling, embling, and embling the inside, and thereby openly insulting the victim D, while the victim’s imprisecule was being observed by many other persons.

2. At the date, time, and place referred to in the above paragraph (a) of this Article, the defendant must see whether the victim E is treated as a criminal, i.e., the victim E, for the purpose of preventing the victim E from taking a bath to the above D as above;

In governance, several persons, "the age of the people," have been observed, and the victim E was sexually insulting. The victim E was sexually insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow