The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, around December 3, 2015, within the subway station 2 of the subway station of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul on December 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) within the subway station 18-ro 18 subway stations; (b) on the ground that the victim B, who is a security pipeline, said the Defendant said that the Defendant would remove the Defendant’s abspon in the floor, the Defendant’s train room passengers’ number of passengers, the Defendant reported that “the Defendant is equal to the Defendant’s Chewing fluor, fluor, bit

The victim openly insultingd the victim by openly brupting the pulse called "aute".

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1). According to the written agreement bound in the trial records of this case, the victim may recognize the fact that the complaint against the defendant was revoked on December 22, 2015, which is the date of the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.