logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.12.23 2014고단2584
사기등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In around 2008, the Defendant entered G Co., Ltd. in Sungwon-si F, Sungwon-si, and worked as the head of the quality control team of the above company while working as the head of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, etc., the Defendant is in charge of the duties of requesting a certified test and analysis agency with respect to heating machinery, etc., which are parts of K 21st K, supplied to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, etc., and submitting the test report

1. Around July 2011, the Defendant forged the test report (TAS-038045) in the name of the president of the Korea Chemical Examination and Research Institute (TAS-038045) in the name of the president of the Korea Chemical Examination and Research Institute (TAS-038045) in a way that, at the above G office, the Defendant laid the existing test report into the X-cell file and voluntarily recorded the date of receipt, the date of completion of the test, and the date of publication, and then forged 44 copies of the test report in the name of the president of the Korea Chemical Convergence and Research Institute (TAS-038045) from April 201 to June 2013.

2. On November 2012, the Defendant at the foregoing G office, including the submission of forged test results to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. From December 201 to November 2013, the Defendant used the forged test results on a total of 150 occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Form (1) from December 201 to November 2013.

3. On November 2012, the defrauded submitted the falsified test report to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration and received KRW 1,162,040 in return for the supply of parts to the victims, and received KRW 1,162,040 in return. From January 2012 to December 2013, the Defendant received KRW 157,584,484 in sum from the victims’ Defense Acquisition Program Administration, etc. as indicated in the crime list, and acquired the victims’ property by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. A written accusation or test report;

1. Each investigation report and list of evidence attached thereto: 10 through 15, 17 through 22, 24 through 33, 37 through 41, and 43 through 43;

arrow