logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.09 2014고단7320 (1)
공문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No gambling shall be conducted using a racing conducted by the Korean Racing Association.

Nevertheless, on March 22, 2013, the Defendant delivered intent and amount to purchase horse tickets, including the anticipated number, to purchase horse tickets at the private horse office of H operation, at the GTS’s residence, etc. on or around March 22, 2013, and remitted three million won to the deposit account (CU) in the name of the foreign exchange bank in the name of CTS, and, after the completion of the racing, transferred the horse horse riding in accordance with the result of the racing, the Defendant received dividends according to the pre-determined dividend rate and did not get out of the horse riding, but paid 20% of the purchase price of the horse tickets or settled it in the post-paid credit after the completion of all the racing. From July 6, 2012 to May 17, 2013, the Defendant remitted the purchase price of the horse tickets to 174,570,500 won or the amount paid out by using the horse racing in the name of CTS, such as the deposit account in the name of CT.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of examination of the accused and AL prepared by the prosecution;

1. AL’s copy of a text of the AL Kakaoo Stockholm message;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of participation in private golf players BB)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Article 50 subparagraph 2 of the Korean Racing Association Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order lies in purchasing and printing private horse tickets directly by the defendant, and if the purchaser purchased the so-called private horse racing office operator in connection with the so-called private horse racing office operator and purchased the horse ticket less than the purchaser's price, it is equivalent to the purchase price.

arrow