The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant, after being abused by the victim D, was frightened to defend them, and the Defendant was frightened to the gas gun, but was faced with the wound by the gas gun, and that the Defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim, the judgment of the court below convicting the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows: (a) the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court: (b) the victim D consistently visited the Defendant’s house in order to kill the Defendant with F on July 30, 2016, along with F on which the victim D had consistently visited the Defendant; (c) the Defendant: (a) made the apartment door-to-faced a gas gun with his head to the heatr; (b) made the Defendant’s head to the string; and (c) made the Defendant’s head to the seat near the guard room; (b) when the F visited the Defendant’s house, the father and his father visited the Defendant, the Defendant stated that the head of the Plaintiff was flowed from gas gun to the head of his father; and (c) the Defendant also made a statement that there was little gas head in the process of smoking with the victim when the victim D visited the victim during the investigation; and (d) the Defendant’s head was not found to have suffered from the gas gun.

B. In the above judgment of the court below, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, i.e., (i) the victim consistently committed assault, such as (i) the victim’s objection, and (ii) the victim’s head in a gas gun, etc.