logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단911
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Jeonju District Court on July 2, 2008 to a fine of KRW 700,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, from the Jeonju District Court on June 28, 2010 to a fine of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and from the Jeonju District Court on April 23, 2013 to a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant driven D 7 vehicles under the influence of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.188% without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 850 meters from the front day of the front day of the arm’s length in the front day of the arm’s length in the front day of the city, 01:53 on April 8, 2015.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. When the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on the road in front of the above C at the same time, controlled the vehicle driving, the Defendant used his resident registration number outside of the mar E to commit the act as if the Defendant was E, and written E’s name in the name column of the report on detection of the mar driver and the report on the circumstantial statement of the mar driver, and signed and sealed on the next page.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, forged one copy of the report on detection of a master driver and the report on the circumstantial statement of a master driver in E, respectively.

B. The Defendant, at the time and at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, exercised the following: (a) the security and traffic of the Jeonnan Police Station, which was aware of the forgery, as seen above, a forged driver detection report and the circumstantial statement report of the host driver, as if they were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The results of an entry report, an entry report, an entry report, the appearance, uniform, and attitude of a drinking driver;

arrow