logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.09.24 2013고단1113
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 27, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million by the Seoul Southern District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 22, 2007, and a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Western District Court on May 22, 2007, and at the Changwon District Court on October 18, 2010, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

At around 23:30 on February 19, 2013, the Defendant driven a B EFweet or other car under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of approximately 1km from the front of the projectto the front of the projecttopian elementary school located in the same tin-dong in the same Gu.

2. Violation of the Resident Registration Act and the Defendant forged private document under the influence of alcohol control at the same date and time as in the preceding paragraph, thereby informing the name and resident registration number of the pro-Japanese Police Station, as if the Defendant was the personal information of the Defendant, the Mapo-dong Police Station Guard, and the slope D belonging to the traffic control division of the name and seal of the Defendant, and without authority, for the purpose of exercising the right to request D to sign and seal on the circumstantial report of the driver under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant stated C as a black-type pen in the confirmation column of the driver under the influence of alcohol, and signed next to it, and forged C’s report on the circumstantial statement of the driver under the name of C, a private document

3. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), issued the falsified report on the circumstantial statement to D, as seen above, as if it had been duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the driver, the control department for the driver, and the report on detection of the driver;

1. The register of driver's licenses.

arrow