beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On October 5, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court, and on the 25th of the same month, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime, and on April 23, 2013, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by receiving a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime from the same court.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant was driving a Dbee-cracked car in a state of under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.063% without obtaining a driver’s license on a section of about 10km from 22 km to C, located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, to a level of about 10km.
2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document was discovered in front of the Incheon Jung-gu Incheon Central Police Station, which was under the influence of alcohol in front of the C road while driving under the influence of alcohol at the same time, to the Incheon Central Police Station guard and a slope E, a police officer belonging to the traffic safety department, and subsequently, presented the F’s driver’s license, which was in advance, in order to conceal the fact of driving without the driver’s license, and presented it as the Defendant’s driver’s license.
3. The Defendant forged a private document and the uttering of a private document at the same date and time, as mentioned in paragraph (2), and at the same place, discovered in the crackdown on drinking driving, and then, in the “name of the originator” column of the written report on the situation statement of the driver prepared by G, the guard and traffic of the Incheon Central Police Station and the police officer belonging to the traffic safety department, “F as if the Defendant was F,” and delivered the written report on the situation statement of the driver who was forged to G, who was aware of the forgery, as seen above, as if the document was duly formed.
In this respect.