Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. At around 06:20 on September 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the site B at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Defendant: (b) held a meeting to verify the identity of the victim D (the 64 years old) who is safety personnel at the construction site in order to verify whether the Defendant, while refusing to employ the above union members at the construction site with other union members; (c) on the ground that the Defendant demanded the safety personnel at the construction site of the above construction site to verify the identity of the foreigner; (d) on the ground that the victim was able to do so while refusing to do so; (e) the victim, etc., who was going after the bitV vehicle after the bitV vehicle at the right edge of the Defendant, was pushed with the victim’s left shoulder; and (e) continued to stand with the Defendant’s bit.
2. Applicable provisions of Acts to the facts charged: Judgment dismissing the victim's expression of no punishment after the prosecution is instituted under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.