Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 31, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 0.083% of blood alcohol level, and the Defendant driven a C E-cub vehicle at the section of approximately 1.5km from the shooting distance in front of viewing in the Geum-dong in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si to the front road in front of the same Sin-dong.
2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) stated F’s resident registration number (G) as if he was his resident registration number, which was the person who was required to verify his identity from D and E on the above multi-party real estate in front of the foregoing temporary location; and (b) unlawfully used F’s resident registration number.
3. The Defendant, at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (2), measured alcohol, and signed a signature box on the F’s name that was demanded to sign the column for signature signature of the driver of the notice of the results of the influence on drinking driving on the screen of the police portable Information Terminal (PDA) and used the above F’s signature without authority for the purpose of uttering. Around that time, the Defendant forged the above F’s signature with the intention of uttering, and used the above forged signature to reach the person in charge of the National Police Agency who could not know of the forgery through the traffic police computer network.
4. The Defendant: (a) stated “F” in the name column of the report on the Statement on the Statement on the Statement on the Statement on the Pool Drivers, in which F’s personal information is stated, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2); and (b) stamped the Defendant’s right-hand impression; (c) forged one copy of the report on the Statement on the Statement on the Statement on the Pool Drivers, which is a private document pertaining to the certification of facts; and (d) exercised the report on the Pool Drivers’ Statement on the Pool Drivers, which was forged to the above E at around that time, as if the report on the Pool Drivers’ Statement was duly formed.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant.