logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.21 2018노885
폭행등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A misunderstanding the fact that Defendant A 1 was guilty, Defendant A was only subject to unilateral humiliation and assault from the victim B on December 18, 2016, and did not assault the victim B.

A victim B was injured by Defendant A on December 26, 2016

Although the victim B was asserting that he was assaulted by C on December 24, 2016.

In light of the fact that Defendant A made a statement, and the fact that Defendant A was strokeed on or around October 2016 and there was no means to bring the victim B at the time, it is reasonable to deem that the injury suffered by the victim B was caused by the assault by Defendant A, not by the Defendant A, and that the said Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim B.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2) The sentence of the lower court (an amount of KRW 3 million) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B’s misunderstanding of the facts as follows: (a) Defendant B was merely a unilateral assault against the victim A on December 18, 2016; and (b) the victim’s head, face, etc. were not taken over.

Defendant

B on December 26, 2016, when the victim head A was found to be the flooder on December 26, 2016, or when the victim's hand hacks the victim's hand hacks, there is no fulg.

At the time of Defendant B’s filing a report in 112, the victim A was flicked with a fracker with a fracker, and Defendant B was not at the time of the victim A with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a fracker with a victim A.

It is difficult to view it.

2) The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (an amount of KRW 300,00) is too unreasonable.

(c)

In full view of the prosecutor (defendant B)’s fact-finding records, recording files and records recorded at the time of the instant case, and the statement in the police interrogation protocol against C of the Seoul Northern District Prosecutor’s Office No. 2017 type No. 10871, the Defendant.

arrow