1. The judgment of the court of first instance is below among the plaintiff, defendant SP construction, and defendant E.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant Sacheon-si, Inc., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant SAD Construction”) on June 7, 2012

the G market facility modernization project in Sacheon City F (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”)

)에 관한 도급을 주었고, 피고 에스에이치건설은 이 사건 공사 현장에서 직접 이 사건 공사의 관리 및 감독을 하였다. 2) 원고는 2012. 6. 21. 14:05경 위 G시장 시설현대화사업장 내에 있던 높이 8미터의 2층 공중화장실 철거작업 현장 주변을 지나고 있었는데, 공중화장실 철거작업을 위해 굴삭기를 운전하고 있던 피고 E가 굴삭기를 작동하면서 굴삭기에 부착되어 있는 일명 ‘크라샤’로 벽면의 일부를 잡아당겨 벽면 일부를 공사 현장 외부에 설치되어 있던 안전 휀스 밖으로 튕겨 나가게 하였고, 이에 원고는 벽면 일부 및 철근 등의 구조물에 깔려 우측 근위 경골 개방성 골절, 양측 치골 골절, 비골 골절, 요도 손상, 좌측 척골신경 손상 등을 입었다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiff, on June 21, 2012, received a set of flags from the right to the right, and wears current artificial arms.

3) Defendant SAD Construction awarded a subcontract for the removal of the instant construction works to Nonparty H Company, which is engaged in removal and work using construction machinery, such as scrails, and Defendant E was employed from H Company I as a daily article from H Company, and caused the instant accident during the instant accident period. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, and the entries in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 (including serial numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. The employer’s liability under Article 756 of the Civil Act to determine the claim against Defendant E and E is related to the performance of the work by an employee who used another person to engage in the work.