A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 19, 2012, the Defendant, at around 12:20 on June 19, 2012, opened a entrance by using the key in the “E” restaurant for the operation of the victim D in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and opened the entrance into the said structure, and continued to intrude into the said structure, and opened a safe located in the calculation unit, and stolen cash worth KRW 1.40,000,000, owned by the victim.

2. On July 11, 2012, between around 04:00 and around 06:00 on July 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened the screen of the window of the living room in the victim G located in the 2nd floor in the south-gu Seoul metropolitan area; (b) went into the said dwelling after opening the door; and (c) went into the said dwelling; and (d) cut off a cell phone with the cash of KRW 400,00 and KRW 800,000,000, the market price of the victim H owned, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

Facts No. 1

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. The fact that he/she has reported an investigation (related to attaching CCTV screens at the scene of the crime);

1. Partial statement of each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Seizure records;

1. Investigation report (as to attachment of photographs inside suspect's residence), each photograph;

1. Investigation report (with respect to attachment of seized articles seized at the suspect's residence), each photograph;

1. Investigation report (in the case of photographic photographs of a sports composition held by a suspect, each photograph);

1. Investigation report (to be deemed that the applicant is not the user of the NAEN and to be the user of the NAEN);

1. Notification of communications data;

1. Each on-site photograph and the on-site log (the crime set forth in the judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel is proved to have been committed by not only the defendant but also I. However, according to the evidence above, the defendant can be fully convicted of the facts charged that the defendant committed the above crime, and even if the evidence is examined in light of the defendant's defense counsel, it is doubtful whether I is a human being in existence. The above assertion is unacceptable). The above argument is applicable to the law.