1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 21, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was trained at the New Disease Education Team on the part of the Army, and went through a stage, and later returned to the Armed Forces Armed Forces Armed Forces (hereinafter “instant wounds”), but the number of the face-to-date signboards escape certificates (hereinafter “the instant wounds”) was serious, and was discharged from military service on January 9, 2013.

B. On January 24, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that the Plaintiff was dead during the training for a new illness education unit, and that the Plaintiff continued to undergo unreasonable training at an open level. However, on July 13, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the eligibility of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s existing disease was not directly related to the performance of his/her duties during his/her service or that the Plaintiff’s existing disease was not aggravated beyond natural progress,” on the ground that there was no external symptoms, such as the boom or damage in spine that

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 4, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including additional numbers), the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Determination on the legality of the instant disposition

A. On July 10, 2004, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) on August 10, 2004, the Plaintiff was 11 years of age, and had been receiving treatment on the part of the Plaintiff or receiving treatment from the part of the Plaintiff before entering the hospital, and had been living a normal life without any fluence; (b) on August 29, 2012, on August 29, 2012, the date eight days after the Plaintiff entered the new military training team, the difference occurred due to the Plaintiff’s birth of her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

B. Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service.