A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 7, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor and three years of suspended execution in Seoul Southern District Court due to the crime of interference with business, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 21, 2019.

At around 09:40 on June 17, 2018, the Defendant Da managed by the victim C in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and returned to the Defendant without calculating the spawn of the spawn, and even upon the victim's request, he saw that "the spawn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn spathn."

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's marina business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the fourth protocol of trial;

1. An investigation report (in the face of a criminal record CD), a video CD;

1. Each written statement in C and E;

1. Division: Criminal history records, inquiry reports, investigation reports, application of statutes on judgment;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of the fact that the defendant is against the defendant and that there has been an agreement with the victim);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (order to provide community service in order to prevent recidivism of the accused and to provide the accused with an opportunity to reflect seriously);