A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 18, 2016, at the Daegu Suwon Police Station investigation and the Office of Economic Three Team offices, the Defendant stated that the Defendant was dismissed of the case on the grounds that he was accused of the complaint, and that the Defendant did not go to the slope C belonging to the above police station, which was being investigated for the investigation of the case, and that “this spawh, this path day, this year, and this year, it was a brupting network for internal life due to the collapse,” and that the Defendant used the spawn of the Defendant’s left shoulder one time by spawnizing the spawn used in the spawn.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of D, E, and F;

1. Protocol of examination of witness regarding C;

1. Photographss of the victim's assault part, and physical exercise pictures;

1. Report on internal investigation (the relation between the accused A and the slope C) (the defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not assault C. However, according to the witness's concrete and consistent statement, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed an assault to police officers C as stated in the judgment of the defendant according to the witness's detailed and consistent statement.) of the law

1. The relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment, the reason for sentencing of sentence for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommendation] No basic area (6 to one year and four months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of obstruction of performance of official duties) and no basic area (6 to one year and four months) (the special person] [decision of sentence] The Defendant found a police station on April 18, 2016 when he/she was dissatisfied with a female police officer who was a true person in charge of the case, and committed violence against the said police officer who investigated other cases.

The defendant was arrested as an offender in the act of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the next day, while moving to the place to undergo the investigation, and at the same time, the above police officer was set up behind the place.

The defendant's site of obstruction of performance of official duties was on the police station as well as the Dong police officer who was on the job at the time.