Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:05, at the first floor of the Diplomatic Association in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (b) on May 2, 2012, the Defendant: (c) was informed by his wife of his/her complaint of his/her involvement in the religious order of the church; and (d) was informed by his/her slope C of the Daejeon Military Police Station E-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, who was called out

Accordingly, the Defendant “In the event of this spulpule”, and the Defendant, by hand, assaulted C’s back head on one occasion by drinking spule with spulbling the bat of the above C with spule.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public order.

2. On May 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender as stipulated in the foregoing paragraph (1) at the Daejeon District of the Daejeon Police Station E District located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; and (b) led the Defendant to wait for the Defendant to undergo an examination of witness against H while the slopeF belonging to the same district unit was arrested as a flagrant offender as stipulated in the foregoing paragraph (1).

At that time, the Defendant, who is another witness, had heard the contents of the statement made by I to the police officer, and used the Defendant’s handphone, which was cited as a knife, to the above F, used the Defendant’s handphone, which was used by the said F as a knife, and used the said handphone to monitor in front of the F in the process of investigating the witness.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to the prosecution of I;

1. Each police statement made with respect to J, I, K, H, C, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant of the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order is considered to be in the church where the wife attends, and thus, to the related persons, such as the members of the church.