logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.22 2017누86509
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, since Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to deletion of the last 3 through 4.2 (III) of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(1) The plaintiff's appeal does not differ significantly from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is examined, the court of first instance's findings and determination are justified). 2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow