1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the third 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance is " December 14, 1987" and the fourth 17 of the judgment of first instance is "A No. 3-2", and the main sentence of Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited as it is, except where the fourth 17 of the judgment of first instance is used "A No. 3-2".

(1) The plaintiff's appeal does not differ significantly from the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and even if the plaintiff's assertion and the evidence submitted are examined, it is not recognized that the traffic accident occurred as the main reason for the duty or education and training directly related to the national defense security or the protection of the people's lives and property, or that the plaintiff's claim was different due to the above traffic accident. Thus, the court of first instance's findings of fact and judgment are just and they are dismissed. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.