1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, except for the modification of the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was examined in the first instance trial and the first instance trial, does not significantly differ from the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial. The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable. The court of first instance that amended the “3 December 25, 2012” of the second instance judgment to “ December 23, 2012.”

No. 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is amended to “No. 1, 2, and 4” “No. 1, 2, and 4.”

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance revises “UFDG support person” as “UFDG support person (the plaintiff submitted the Plaintiff’s membership card to the court of first instance with Gap evidence No. 6, and the above membership card was about the period of 2017-2018, and at the time of refugee interview investigation, the Plaintiff stated that he was only a support person for UFDG, and is not a member).”

No. 5 of the first instance judgment is amended to “a passport” as “a visa for entry into the Republic of Korea”.

The following parts shall be added between conduct 7 and 8 of the first instance judgment:

【D) In addition to the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff is satisfied with the horns of rhinoceros (Peuhl) and that the RPG support entity is the horseing entity, such judgment does not interfere with the foregoing.

A person shall be appointed.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.