logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.23 2016누78211
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except where "the court was sentenced" and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim on February 2, 201 is justifiable, and the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is justifiable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent that the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow