The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates English academic rooms for elementary, middle, and high school students at the defendant's house located in 102 dong 104, 102, and 104, and the victim D (year 12) is a student in the above-mentioned academic room.

No person shall commit any physical abuse against a child, or termination of his/her physical health and development.

Nevertheless, at around 10:00 on March 19, 2016, the Defendant, at the above Defendant’s house, called “whether the same problem as the one set forth on the Typt and Typt is why why why the victim continued to do so,” and when the victim’s hand floor was 6 times at the beginning of the meeting (the length, 40cm, wooden material) and 3 times the left arms and right arms respectively.

As a result, the Defendant committed a physical abuse that causes damage to the body of a child at the same time, which leads to the victim's multi-satisfyal satisfy which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of a medical certificate, evidence photographing statute

1. Article 71 (1) 2, Article 17 subparagraph 3 (a) of the Child Welfare Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. 80,000 won of a fine to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the suspension of sentence is against the first offender without any previous criminal record, and the intent to well mislead the victim seems to result in the crime of this case by failing to control the appraisal of the remaining netly, and failing to do so. The victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and most of the students and their parents who are enrolled in the public book room in the ruling are continuously using the public book room in the future.