The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant only stated the truth on the Internet bulletin, without stating any false fact, and the relevant court rulings and letters stored in K are individually stored as supporting the truth, and not posted for the purpose of slandering. Thus, the court below found the Defendant guilty of impairing reputation by pointing out false facts or facts for the purpose of slandering, and there is an error of misunderstanding of facts.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant cannot be deemed to have deprived of the victim's business committed by the defendant during a series of processes, such as the establishment of a new stop business and the operation of a new stop business, etc., and there is no ground to acknowledge that the victim embezzled public funds to purchase art products or made a milk-related relationship with the public official, etc., the defendant did not receive any distribution of the profits from the sale of the stop at the request of the defendant, and to slander the victim, as stated in paragraph (1) of the facts constituting the crime of the court below, "A" bulletin board of "the Internet site" and "Neber" as indicated in paragraph (1) of the crime of the court below, each "D Co., Ltd. has a legitimate right to do so, and the defendant also embezzled public funds by purchasing personal art products by using joint funds, embezzled one of the victim's tax evasion persons, and seized the above business with the public official's milk relationship with him to the effect that the defendant's share in the above business is presumed to be true or unfounded."