logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.27 2012고단6102
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of [2013 Highest 810, [2013 Highest 1096] and [2012 Highest 6102].

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on May 27, 2010, and the above judgment was finalized on June 4, 2010, and the execution was terminated on July 19, 201.

Defendant

D On March 23, 2010, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced 2 years and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) and completed its enforcement on July 12, 2012.

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Forgery of private documents and uttering of private documents by Defendant A;

A. On July 11, 2012, the Defendant conspireds with P to forge private documents, and forged a written confirmation of the acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification in the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation under the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation, as the title, “The confirmation requester: the employee insured: the employee insured, the workplace name: Q Co., Ltd., the date of acquisition of qualification: December 20, 2010; and the details of the health insurance qualification acquisition room under the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation, by affixing seals affixed to the seal of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation on July 11, 2012.”

B. In collusion with P, in order to obtain an increase in the limit of use of the credit card in the name of C by pretending that C works for Q Co., Ltd. at the above time and at the above time, the Defendant used the forged document by facsimile by transmitting one of the above-mentioned written confirmation of acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification to the employees in charge of Samsung Card Co., Ltd., who knew of the forgery.

2. Defendant A, Defendant B’s fraud, and P are recruited by loan clients who need urgency as a loan hub, and submit false documents concerning the client’s employment, wages, etc. to the credit card company and obtain the loan clients’ approval by raising the amount of credit card use.

arrow