The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the form of punishment) of the lower court is too unreasonable in light of the following: (i) the Defendant was the first offender and is against his mistake; (ii) all agreements with the victims; and (iii) the possibility of hindering his livelihood due to community service work.

2. "1. Forgery of private documents" in paragraphs (b) and (c) of 2012 Highest 6878 among the facts charged at the trial.

C. On March 7, 2012, the Defendant, at the above Defendant’s residence, set aside a “health insurance card” in the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation, which was in possession of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation Co., Ltd., and printed out the name of the place of business by using the computer as “B”.

For the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the health insurance card in the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation, which is a private document on rights and duties.

On March 7, 2012, the Defendant, at the residence of the above Defendant, contained “written confirmation of acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification” under the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation under the above method, and compiled the name of the workplace into “(D)” by using computers, and printed out the date of issuance into “08” on February 2012.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant forged one copy of the National Health Insurance Acquisition and Loss Certificate under the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation.

Section 3-B of the facts charged “3. Uttering of a private document, or uttering of a forged private document.”

B. On March 8, 2012, the Defendant, at the J lending Business Office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, offered to K representative of the victim J loan a copy of a forged employment certificate, such as the above-mentioned 1-b through (d) and 2, and exercised the above-mentioned 1-ba and a copy of a health insurance certificate, a health insurance certificate, and a written confirmation of the health insurance qualification loss to the victim who is unaware of the forgery.

"each change".