A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 22, 2016, around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) was suspected of driving alcohol and controlled by putting up a vehicle in the vicinity of the drinking control place; (b) on October 22, 2016, around the Seo-gu Incheon Western Police Station B police station B, Incheon, with a usual knowledge.

D’s resident registration number (E) is one of its own resident registration numbers, and thus, the police officer C, who was unaware of this, entered the above D’s personal information in the statement report on the situation of the driver in charge, and the Defendant directly entered D’s name in the driver’s report on the situation of the driver in charge, and signed it.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged the statement report on the situation of the driver in charge for the purpose of exercising.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at a place specified in paragraph 1 and at a place specified in paragraph 1, issued a written statement showing the circumstances of the driver in charge, which was forged, to Gyeong, and exercised the said investigation document.

3. The Defendant, such as public electronic records, issued a resident registration number of D, as prescribed in paragraph 1, for the purpose of causing public office's affairs at the date, time, and place under paragraph 1, and signed D's personal information in a report on the results of drinking driving control (defation) by accessing PDA (police carrying machine) to a traffic police network to PDA (PDA) and allowing C to enter the personal information of D's report, and signed D's name in PDA (police carrying machine) by requesting C to sign the above PDA (police carrying machine).

Accordingly, the defendant, who is an electronic record of a public office, has forged a report on the crackdown on drinking driving(s) in the traffic police computer network.

4. The summary of the evidence is that the Defendant, such as electronic records, exercised the electronic records that were written as above at the time and at a place specified in paragraph (1) by allowing C, a senior police officer, who is aware of the fact, to transmit the electronic records to the traffic police computer network.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on the circumstances of driving at home.