A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant pays 20,000,000 won to C who is an applicant for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2009, the defendant of criminal records was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for embezzlement, etc. at the Gwangju District Court of Gwangju on February 25, 2010. The judgment became final and conclusive on February 25, 2010. On May 3, 2013, the judgment became final and conclusive on May 11, 2013, and is currently in the execution of the sentence in the current So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called".

On February 20, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The father in the city shall be the head of the GG and the former president of the high school. The head of the above school shall send 35 million won to the victim F at the E-mail House located in Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-gu. The father in the city shall be the former president of the GG and the former president of the high school.”

However, as above, the Defendant only intended to pay 35 million won working expenses to pay personal debts, and did not have the intent or ability to have the victims employed them as teachers of middle and high schools.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received money KRW 35 million from the victim to the new bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant designated as the working expenses for the above teachers on February 25, 2009.

around 16:00 on July 31, 2009, the Defendant, “2013 Godan1021,” said that the Defendant would transfer the right of operation when paying down payment KRW 20,000,00 to the victim C at the K coffee shop located in the Seo-gu Seoul Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

However, in fact, the MOA, which operates the above school, has caused legal disputes between relatives and interested parties around 2007, and the function of the board of directors was terminated. As a result of the audit of the Gwangju District Office of Education, it has been operated as a temporary director system appointed by the Office of Education until October 2013. The defendant was not a director of the above foundation at the time and was not involved in the operation, and the school intermediary has also been deposited to the existing lessee.