A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is working as a manufacturer of an infant vehicle.

On April 199, 199.

On April 10, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2009.

1. Crimes against the victim B;

A. On August 6, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B at the C coffee shop located in Seo-gu, Gwangju, stating that “The Defendant shall be liable for KRW 20 million and be employed for the victim’s children to work on a car.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to have the victims employed in a car.

On August 7, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained the money of KRW 20 million from the Agricultural Cooperative (D) account under the name of the Defendant’s name under the pretext of employment teaching expenses on August 7, 2008.

B. At around 17:00 on January 15, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim stating that “The Defendant shall be a person who requested the employment of a person who has requested the employment of a person who has requested the employment.” The Defendant stated that “The head of the merchandise coupon 20 is dead.”

However, as seen earlier, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to have the victims employed the car.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 10,000 won gift certificates 20,000 won (2 million won) under the pretext of employment training in the above place on the following day from the victim test.

2. Around February 11, 2008, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E made a false statement to the victim E by stating that “The victim E will be employed in a car with the victim’s 15 million won if he/she is the head of the Dong-gu, Gwangju.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to find employment for the victim's children in a car.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 15 million won under the pretext of employment teaching expenses on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B and E, respectively.