The term of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of Nos. 1, 2, and 3 in the judgment of the defendant and the crimes of No. 4 in the judgment of the defendant shall be two months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 2, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment was finalized on December 10, 2009. On July 8, 2010, the Gwangju District Court sentenced a suspended sentence of two years to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on July 16, 2010. On April 30, 2012, the suspended sentence sentenced on December 2, 2009 was revoked.

[Criminal facts] 2016 Highest 4357

1. On February 2009, the Defendant, at a main point where it is impossible to know the trade name in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, 2009, sent the victim C an attitude that the victim would have been employed in the Republic of Korea by having son work in the Republic of Korea, Edo within the Republic of Korea, while showing D’s certificate of employment.

However, since the defendant was unaware of the person who could have influence on the personnel affairs of Korean power, the defendant could not have employed the above victim's children in Korean power.

The Defendant received transfer of KRW 4 million on March 2, 2009, and KRW 7 million on March 20, 2009, respectively, from the above victims to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant, and KRW 3 million on March 20, 200, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the above victim.

2. On October 22, 2009, the Defendant, at “G Multilateral” located in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area F, expressed that “A claim to be received from an interesting construction (the State) is KRW 290 million, and that “A claim to be received from an interesting construction (the State) will be paid in cash if a claim to be received from another person is lent the agreed amount of the case in the present trial,” and took the attitude that the Defendant would be able to pay the borrowed amount properly.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant would have H find the knish in Korean power and offer it to H.

It is intended to receive money in return for the purchase of real estate and to make profits from the resale.

The fraud by which the down payment for real estate sale has been made.