The judgment below

The guilty part (including the part not guilty) shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,800,000.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 및 법리오해 (2018. 3. 2.자 및 2018. 3. 21.~24.자 업무방해의 점) 1) 피고인은 이 사건 신축공사 현장을 거의 매일 방문하였고, 그때마다 매번 똑같은 행동을 하여 피해자 D의 공사업무를 방해하였음에도 이 부분 각 공소사실을 모두 무죄로 판단한 원심판결에는 사실오인의 위법이 있다. 2) 설령, 피고인이 신축공사 현장에 방문하지 않았다고 하더라도, 피고인이 공사현장 입구에 화물차를 주차해두어 통행을 방해하였다는 사실은 원심에서도 인정되었고, 그러한 사실만으로도 피해자의 공사업무를 위력으로써 방해한 것으로 볼 수 있음에도 2018. 3. 21.∽24.자 업무방해의 공소사실을 무죄로 판단한 원심판결에는 법리오해의 위법이 있다.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (1.5 million won of a fine) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. On March 2, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s work by force, such as making it impossible for the Defendant to file a complaint against the damage of property if the Defendant continues to perform construction by using any material in the construction site in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2) On March 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) on March 21, 2018; (b) on March 22, 2018; (c) on the new construction site in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu; (d) on the 24th day of the same month; and (e) on the 24th day of the same month; and (e) on the 24th day of the same month; and (e) on the eth day of the new construction site in Mapo-gu; and (e) on March 2, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s work by blocking the entrance of the international cargo-lane construction site; and (e) at the same time, obstructing traffic by traffic.

B. The lower court’s determination is the victim’s.