(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.05.14 2013고정1666

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.05.14 2013고정1666

업무방해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged [2013 Go-Ma1666] around 17:0 on July 17, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the construction work of the victim’s building by force over about 40 minutes in a way that the victim D, who was the head of the above construction site, was unable to receive the construction cost from the victim D at the site of the studio-built construction site located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si. The Defendant stated that “the victim would take measures to compensate if materials are damaged,” and that “the victim would drive away the victim, take a bath, and interfere with his movement.”

[2013 High Court Decision 2252]

A. At around 08:30 to 09:10 on June 13, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s work to prevent the progress of the work at the construction site by force for the employees invested to undertake the interior construction work at the time on the ground that he did not receive the cost of the construction work at the construction site at the time on the Kimpo C Studio construction site at the time on the ground that he did not receive the cost of the construction work at the construction site at the time.

B. At around 08:35 to 09:30 on June 14, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the progress of construction works at the construction site by force, such as preventing from entering the construction site any person who was put in order to carry out heating construction works at the time for the said site on the same grounds, and preventing access to the building on the first floor by using a pipe, which was in the site.

2. Determination

A. On June 13, 2013, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that, while demanding the payment of construction cost to the victim, the Defendant stated that “the construction works would be held liable where materials, such as temporary materials, installed inside the inside and outside, are used or damaged,” and that there was no fact that the Defendant and his defense counsel stated that “the construction works would be carried out in a case where materials, such as temporary materials, installed by the inside and outside, are used or damaged,” and that there was no fact that the parts read “the people, all,” or prevented the works of the parts from being carried out,” and that materials are located in the site on the 14th of the same month to the parts of the

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2014.12.11 2014노1663

-대전지방법원 2015.01.06 2013고단3810

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.10.13 2017고단847

-제주지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고정1057

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.10.17 2017가단223070