logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.14 2016고정2477
무고
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.00,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B and Victim A (64) are the divorced spouse relationship.

around 08:30 on April 21, 2013, the Defendant resided with the victim in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

F 아파트 102동 1403호에서, 피해자가 외도를 한다는 이유로 시비가 되어 말다툼을 하던 중, 감정이 격 해져 피해자의 머리 부위를 붙잡아 흔들다가 바닥에 찧게 하고, 고환 부위를 잡아 흔들고 걷어차는 등 피해자에게 약 2 주간의 치료가 필요한 음낭의 타박상 등을 가하였다.

2. On June 21, 2016, Defendant A: (a) around 21, 2016, at a mutual US stenography office located near the Seoul Dobong-gu Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office, 747 Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office; (b) prepared a pre-written complaint and presented it to an employee under the name of the said office; and (c) had the said employee make a false complaint with respect to B using the computer.

The complaint was filed on September 19, 2012, which was assaulted against A on September 19, 201

I have filed a complaint with the Prosecutor's Office of North Korea without complaint.

The content or facts to the effect that “the Defendant inflicted an injury on B on September 19, 2012, and that the Defendant filed a complaint against the Defendant with the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office around November 27, 2014 did not report false facts.

In addition, on November 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the criminal facts with the purport that “B inflicted bodily injury on September 19, 2012” and “B,” and appealed, but the appeal was dismissed by the same court on August 12, 2016, and the appeal was dismissed on October 18, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2016.

Nevertheless, on June 21, 2016, the defendant filed a complaint with the public prosecutor's office, whose name is not known in the comprehensive public prosecutor's office of Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office, which is pending in the above public prosecutor's office.

Accordingly, the defendant had not been punished for the purpose of having B receive criminal punishment.

arrow